Response to Chapters
1 & 2
Notes
Chapter 1 Historical Foundations of Reading
(there will be an emphasis on
historical, sociological, and theoretical foundations of reading instruction)
Mid 1700 BC Hieroglyphic writing
1,000 BC Laws of Ur-Nammu of Ur Mesopotatmia
2000 BC Phoenician alphabet only consonant
sounds
850 BC The Iliad and the Odyssey (before the
alphabet revision—they were verbal)
1100 AD Arabic numbers (maybe before and maybe
from India)
600-1400 AD Illuminations
1446 AD Gutenburg movable type press 1st Bible
to be type set
1600-1900 AD Reading instruction follows the two
stage model first stage letter sounds; second stage meaning
1686 Church Law that common children should
learn to read in order to ensure their salvation
1700s Hornbooks and schooling revolves around
moral, ethical, and religious instruction, first materials were filled with
religious ideas (Christian Taliban)
1731 Ben Franklin founds the first public
library in colonies
1798 Blue Black Spellers http://books.google.com/books/about/The_American_Spelling_Book.html?id=x7EqAAAAMAAJ
1820s National Council of English Teachers
founded
1914 First reading assessment William Gray
1920-1960 Reading viewed as a one stage process a
de-emphasis on phonics
1941 Dick and James utilized “look and
say” method
- Controlled vocabulary
- Round robin reading
- Reading developed defined by oral reading primarily;writing-handwriting
- Think and do work books
- Behaviorism philosophy—sticker rewards
- Teacher centered classroom
1950 National Reading
conference founded
Why
Johnny Can’t Read and What to do About it published pro
phonics
IRA founded
1956 International Reading Association (IRA) founded
1957 College Reading
Association founded
1960 Dick and Jane
Readers still in use
reading
instruction was level oriented, round robin with basal
readers was the norm
Mid to late 1970s Reading is more researched based
Emphasis on diagnosis/remediation
medical model –whole language model highly criticized and proposed to be thrown
out
1983 Nation at Risk
Late 1980s Reading wars –phonics v whole
language start to suggest balanced
approach
1990 Marilyn Jager Adams publishes a book Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning
about Print points to necessity of phonological and phonemic awareness
needed to read
Late 1990s Balanced approach comes into view and is
accepted
Mid-2000 Focus on individualized, differentiated instruction, meeting AYP, using eclectic, commonsense-balanced approaches to help each child succeed
Text Notes (Historical, Theoretical. and Sociological Foundations of Reading in the United States --Jeanne B. Cobb & Mary K. Kallus
Throughout history those who are
literate or who can read and write, record events have a higher social status.
Civilization itself is defined partially through its ability to record events
and items.
History
of Reading and Writing
The
Earliest Foundations
Despite reading and writing being a
marker for defining civilization it was around in the Paleolithic era
Logographic—a symbol that represents a
word and languages change to a sound symbol alphabetic system was the
progression or the change that took place as to make the skill of reading and
writing more accessible to more people.
The Phoenician alphabet comes to us via
the Greeks. When disease, invasion, and decline topple the Roman Empire, Western
society takes form by focusing on Christianity and rebuilding. Education grew
out of monasteries and later universities. Universities evolved and became
institutions of scholasticism which use classical works to learn Latin, but upon
closer inspection of the classical works first embrace them and after a while
find their flaws and set out to make their own discoveries. Education first
centered on the elite. Books were costly and labor consuming. With the inventions
of the printing press, the rise of Protestantism and its emphasis on literacy
reading and writing became more common among all.
Reading had a religious flavor to it and
the practical was also emphasized. Children were taught their gender roles as
well as god’s expectations of them while learning to read. Class distinctions
could also be found in the teaching of reading as write. Class was dependent
upon gender and ethnicity. (remember Frederick Douglass ).
The Industrial Revolution (as well as
the American and the French Revolutions) helped change the role and therefore
the definition of Literacy.
(Charity Schools were in place around
the time of the American Revolution and were established to enrich the lives of
poor children.)
Education in Post-Civil War emphasized
phonics, obedience, reading in wholes, prosody, but not comprehension as
comprehension was taken for granted. It was an assembly line that produced a
product.
Literacy is one of those processes that is always changing; it is a product/reflection the period it's in.
Chapter
2 Reading in the Twentieth Century by P. David Pearson
The more I think of the title “The
Reading Wars” the more misgivings I have. Wars are such that they are generally
unnecessary and there are few winners and sometimes no winners. They are partly
about greed and attrition, and they are partly about conserving and defense. It
is unfortunate when the leading educators cannot see fit to come up with a
plan-method-philosophy that will help educate our children and our future.
Reading instruction of the past century
will be examined by breaking it into three periods and comparing the dominant
materials used, the dominant pedagogical practices, role of the teacher, the
role of the learner, and the underlying philosophy of the nature of reading and
learning to read (Pearson, p. 14).
The
Reading Scene at Last Turn of the Century
Researchers/Policy makers Players? of
pre-1900s
Horace Mann
Colonel Frances Parker
Noah Webster and his Blue Back Speller
McGuffey’s Eclectic Readers
Dominant Pedagogical practices relevant
to the time
Drill and Practice of isolated sounds
and letters was on the way out.
Synthetic phonics –alphabetic approach learning the parts before the whole,
initially learning letter names, letter sounds, then syllable blending
activities that were taught in a rigid sequence. Once mastered children were
then introduced to literature (adult literature) and the drill and practice
continued into grammar and rhetoric.Roles / Expectations:
The teacher was expected to provide the correct drill and practice while the student was expected complete the practices and the drills.
Comprehension was not a end result of reading it was the expected byproduct of following the drill and practice exercises. The emphasis of this method was to read with fluency and even to read with elegance. Comprehension was thought to be byproduct of that prosody.
Vocabulary
(According to the alphabetic principle, letters and combinations of letters are the symbols used to represent the speech sounds of a language based on systematic and predictable relationships between written letters, symbols, and spoken words. The alphabetic principle is the foundation of any alphabetic writing system, which is one of the more common types of writing systems in use today.
Alphabetic writing systems that use an (in practice) almost perfectly phonemic orthography have a single letter for each individual speech sound and a one-to-one correspondence between sounds and the letters that represent them. Such systems are used, for example, in the modern languages Estonian, Finnish, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Hungarian and Turkish. Such languages have a straightforward spelling system, enabling a writer to predict the spelling of a word given its pronunciation and similarly enabling a reader to predict the pronunciation of a word given its spelling. Ancient languages with such almost perfectly phonemic writing systems include Avestic, Latin, Tamil, Vedic, and Sanskrit (Devanāgarī/Abugida, see also Vyakarana). On the other hand, French and English have a strong difference between sounds and symbols.
(Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabetic_principle, 13-1-2013).
Use of reason and meaning –innovative
language experience activities and integrated curriculum were only embraced by
the few and practiced in the Lab Schools.
Developments
in the First Third of the Century
Time Period 1900-1935
Early Reading Reforms
Words to Letters
Players
Mitford Mathew (Idea
or Curricular Construct: Word to Letters—whole to part with the letter to sound
correspondence or analytic phonics)
Idea: Words to reading—look-say or whole word method
which had the child memorize some words and then learn phonics Focused
Analysis –did not analyze word to letter but had a group of words that
started with the same letter and noted the
similarity between the words
George Farnham Meaning based approach pictures that were matched to a sentence.
Other
Influential Developments
Players
William S. Gray in 1914 pioneered Reading Performance tests oral
silent
reading was generally measured because (it was easier to do than oral
reading as it could be done as a group, without a
teacher individually giving the
student an assessment and stop watch and multiple
choice questions were what
was used and this was judged to be scientifically
objective even though the test
shaped what was measured
This established testing as the psychometric
measurement without acknowledging
its
weaknesses and that learning is a process
Pestalozzi, Froebel, and Herbart
Text difficulty and readability—was
child centered and had its roots in developmental psychology—its aim was to match
children with texts that reflected their interests and their abilities. Readability was established by various and ever changing formulas whose criteria were
generally based upon sentence difficulty (sentence length and word frequency).
Readiness—grounded in developmental
psychology searched for behavioral precursors to show readiness for acquiring the
reading skills. Such behaviors were:
alphabet knowledge, auditory discrimination,
following directions, language
development, and sometimes kinesthetic and motor
activities
(the best predictor was knowledge of the alphabet)
Reading
Skills curricular construct of skills taught by teachers and learned by students. Corresponding and related to reading
skills is the notion of linear scope and skills that
if taught properly should . Brought about the Basal Reader which only grew and grew and grew.
Remediation
is a medical or psychological construct yet nonetheless has
influenced
education. It starts in the late 1800s and peaks in the 1960s (yet is used
frequently nowadays) and was our only approach until recently of meeting
individual needs. This focus of diagnosis and prescription also fit well with
skills, scope, and sequence approach.
Professional
Consensus was always hoped for but usually not achieved.
During the first third of the century child-centered approaches clashed with a
synthetic phonics alphabetic approach; silent reading and comprehension were
widely accepted; while reading readiness was debated by maturationist and
interventionist, but comparatively speaking it was only the beginning of the
reading wars.
Developments
at Mid-Century
1935-1960s saw a development and
refinement of the prevailing principles of the 35 years before.
- Reading goals starting from grade one should include comprehension, interpretation, and application as well as word recognition.
- Instruction begins with meaningful silent reading of short stories that are grounded in children’s lives
- 50-100 sight words should be learned and then analytic phonics instruction should commence which is one of many cueing systems children should use to unlock new words.
- Phonics lessons should be spread out over a few years instead of being concentrated in the early grades
- Phonics lessons should be contextualized and not taught in isolation
- Early grades readers should be controlled for word frequency
- Children should demonstrate readiness before learning to read
- Children should be instructed in small groups
During this time period reading programs
or basal readers are used, as well as teaching skills and worksheets for practice
Taking
Stock: 2
Methods
and Philosophy
Look Say (Sight words) or Whole Word
approach or words to reading approach
Silent reading
Focus on comprehension, comprehension
being the byproduct of decoding words into oral language and then being
processed in the brain.
The
Legacy of the Scholarship in the 1960s
Players Results
(Don’t
we still use them?)
Link to
old reading texts
this
I deduce that the Dick and Jane books were look and say basal readers.)
Recommends
5 changes: change method to an early emphasis on phonics, re-examine content
and focus on folktales, reevaluate grade levels and challenge readers, develop
new tests (for single skill and mastery), and improve reading research Government
Title
1 and National Right to Read
Taking
Stock: 3
Little changed to redefine the role of
teacher and the role of student the former was still the dispenser of knowledge
and the former was the recipient of said knowledge. What did change was the
return of phonics to the central focus of reading.
Developments
in the Last Third
Reading
as the Province of Other scholarly Traditions
Linguistics (: the study of human speech including the units, nature,
structure, and modification of language)
Players
Results
Charles Fries publishes Linguistics and Reading proposed
what reading instruction would look like if taught by a linguist. This
perspective believed that some things did not need to be taught explicitly
because we would learn some things orally (nabbed, capped, and jaded).
Noam Chomsky published two treatises Syntactic Structures (1957) and Aspects of a Theory of Syntax (1965)
Changes
the way psychologists thought about and
studied the process of language comprehension and acquisition. Chomsky thought
that humans are born wired to acquire the language that they are born into.
Because Chomsky challenged views that were also assumed in reading it
challenged long held and common view on reading.
Psycholinguistics: The study of the relationships between
linguistic behavior and psychological processes, including the process of
language acquisition.
Because of Noam Chomsky a field of
psycholinguistics evolved.
Roger Brown rule-governed basis of
language learning
Brown and his
colleagues found that contrary to earlier beliefs children did not imitate
written language, but were members of a language community and they created
rules of how language worked. They conclude that children are ACTIVE LEARNERS
who inferred rules and tested them out.
Kenneth Goodman and Frank Smith
From the
linguist and psycholinguistics thinking reading educators developed parallel
thinking along the lines of nativist framework that proposed that children can
learn to read and write naturally because they are part of a community that
values reading and writing as a means of communication. What if we assumed that
learning to read and write were having genuine reasons for communicating, and
having so many that the mere exposure would teach them to read and write.
Miscues are
opportunities to view inner workings of mind and comprehension process
Goodman laid out
what he thought were reading/meaning cueing systems: Syntactic (grammatical
relationships in a sentence and their functions); semantic (general sense or
meaning); and Grapho-phonemic the relationships between phonemes (sounds) and
graphemes (written symbols in language).
Language is
self-correcting if one is aware of these cues. The awareness and the use
promote self-sufficiency and independence.
Reading was not
something that one was taught but that one learned to do (Smith, Understanding Reading, 1971). He felt
that reading did not need to be taught but was the consequence or living in a
literate society and making sense of one type of information. One learned to
read from reading. Teacher’s role was not so much to teach but to help children
read. He Felt that learning was a
constructive process and one learned by connecting it with what they
already know. He even thought that
perception was a decision making, predictive process based on what one already
knew.
(We look for
what is familiar. If we are creatures of consistency and wish to have stability
the above statement makes sense. We look for what confirms our worldview. )
Smith felt that
reading was incidentally visual, but that it relied upon cueing systems. These
cueing systems reflected Goodman’s in syntactic, semantic, and visual but Smith
added orthographic (pertaining to the use and nature of symbols in written
language). In fact he felt that the over reliance on visual would slow down and
could hinder the reader. The other three cues were part of the readers prior
knowledge and were relied upon more when it came to making meaning.
Psycholinguistics influenced reading by
valuing making meaning, valuing and paying attention to beginning reading texts, and
their stressing of natural speech patterns. Errors were viewed as miscues and
were windows into the readers mind and how they make meaning, and lastly they
gave us a constructionist model and a means decoding student’s thinking. Reading as language rather than perception
and behavior.
Most importantly psycholinguist helped
shift teaching views. What needed to be taught and the relation between
teaching and learning were major shifts as well as viewing teaching as helping
the child to learn not making the child learn.
Helped professionals to reexamine their
assumptions about language learning and understanding by placing a greater
emphasis on the active, intentional role of language users.
Cognitive psychology--a branch of psychology concerned
with mental processes (as perception, thinking, learning, and memory)
especially with respect to the internal events occurring between sensory stimulation
and the overt expression of behavior—compare behaviorism http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/cognitive%20psychology
Cognitive
psychology extended the constructs of human purpose, intention, motivation,
including perception, attention, comprehension, learning, memory, and an
executive control of all cognitive processes. This is a DRAMATIC switch from only
observable behavior (behaviorism) to studying the how and why internal
processes of how we learn. There was tension between the two camps (dialectical
antagonists ).
Psychologist
studied reading with abandon. One focus was on text comprehension and how readers
comprehend stories and from that came story grammar, expository texts, but
these were incomplete and from this hole in understanding comprehension came
schema theory.
Schema
Theory—is the theory about knowledge as it is represented in memory. It is how
we group and categorize things in our memory, grouping things that are the same
together. It is constructionist in nature and uses the reader’s views of the
world along with their experiences to make meaning with the text.
It
raised the intriguing question of where meaning resides, in the text, with the
author, or with the reader.
Players Results
Piaget
schema theory is linked to accommodation and assimilation
Frederic
Bartlett explained the culturally driven interpretations of folk stories using
schema theory (Because readers actively construct meaning of texts with prior
or background knowledge their cultures provide background to relate and to
construct meaning with.)
Sociolinguistics-- Sociolinguistics is the descriptive study of the effect
of any and all aspects of society, including cultural norms, expectations, and context, on
the way language is used, and the effects of
language use on society. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociolinguistics
Sociolinguistics
developed in conjunction with psycholinguistics. It redefined dialects not as
crude variations of a pure language, but of a well-developed linguistic system
in its own right. It did not represent a linguistic deficit but a linguistic
difference. Teachers should not rid the student of their dialect but give
accommodations.
Sociolinguists
expanded the meaning of context from the words surrounding a particular word on
a page to a social and cultural construction. That “right” was a reflection of
our own perspective and it was relative. Sociolinguists showed that reading was
immersed in many levels of context. The contexts were not just social and
cultural, but are what teachers expect in school and how students interact with
each other.
Players Results
William
Labov The
changing perspective of dialects being their own language system
Joan
Baratz the
changing perspective of dialects should be accommodated
Roger
Shuy It
changed underlying attitudes of what is acceptable
Literary
theory perspective
Louise Rosenblatt Reader
response theory—reading is created through a transaction between the reader and
the text
The
Pedagogical Correlates of New Perspectives
Comprehension on center stage
Literature based reading
A few things converge allowing this to
happen. First Rosenblatt’s reader response theory reappears and is combined
with constructivism which was emphasized by sociolinguists and cognitive
psycholinguists. Next a study, Becoming a
Nation of Readers (Center for the study of Reading, 1985) that stresses the
importance of just reading was published which also coincided with the
appearance of a never before seen number of children’s books, and lastly Nancy
Atwell’s book In the Middle ().
1988 the California Reading Framework
policy was enacted which caused reading levels to become more challenging,
mandated genuine literature be used, replaced comprehension questions with
interpretive and impressionistic authentic responses to literature. This was
done to help motivate students to learn to read and again to provide them with
a more authentic experience that was student lead.
Integrated instruction
Reading was integrated into other
curriculum, to varying degrees, and was integrated into the Language Arts
curriculum (reading, writing, speaking, and listening). Here writing was big
and helping students to read like a writer was the ticket.
Player
Donald Holdaway
Whole Language
By far, whole language is the most far
reaching of comprehension, literature-based reading, process writing, and
integrated instruction. Philosophically it leans toward the radical
constructivist epistemology and is child centered and curricularly it works
with authentic activity and integrates language arts with other subjects. Its
implementation was to be on a classroom level, was anti basal, and was brief.
Skills, such as phonics was placed on the back burner.
Taking
Stock
Whole Language teachers are the
facilitators not the talking head. They observe children and then decide what
they (the children) need. Children are decision makers too deciding what to
read and write. Assignments are authentic and support the learning needs of the
student, materials are those of life—magazines, books, nowadays that would mean
texts, internet blogs, articles, and the like skills and strategies, when
taught are in “mini-lessons.” Reading is viewed as a meaning making process not
a perceptual process. The reader is an active participant.
The
Demise of Whole Language
Unintended curricular consequences
because many moderate instructors didn’t support the changes and without
support it was doomed to failure.
The de-emphasis of skills instruction,
strategy instruction, an emphasis on text structure and reading in the content
areas, questionable application,
Skills were never thought to be not worth the
learning, but were to be taught on the fly and on a needs based basis. This put
in questions if the skill, strategies and such were taught at all. The question
of beginning reading would be answered by the use of empirical studies instead
of rhetoric
Growing dissatisfaction with extreme
positions
Changing research ideology (quantitative
v qualitative)
Politicization of the reading research
and policy agenda
(Aside) The irony here overwhelming. If an effective teacher is the greatest indicator of successful learning then having a highly scripted teaching program seems to contradict this.
Looking
Ahead: Will we Benefit from the Lessons of History?
I
hope that we do benefit. That as educators we find
common ground and recognize the teacher in each other. The time of demonization
should be over. Teachers need to recognize the good in each other and tolerate
each other’s differences. With this united front there is a possibility then to
learn and put the lessons of the swinging pendulum in place keeping an open
mind.
(Aside) Throughout the last approximately 130 years reading education has swung between intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation. Both are needed and necessary for today's workers, but as for today's individuals intrinsic motivation to read multiple texts, be a life long learner, and a participant in today's world is the more important. During the Renaissance learning the classics was thought to make you a better person. Let us hope to apply that same belief to reading education today. To awaken the meaning maker within each learner and give them a sense of agency are two of the lessons I take from the first two chapters of our text.
(Aside) Throughout the last approximately 130 years reading education has swung between intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation. Both are needed and necessary for today's workers, but as for today's individuals intrinsic motivation to read multiple texts, be a life long learner, and a participant in today's world is the more important. During the Renaissance learning the classics was thought to make you a better person. Let us hope to apply that same belief to reading education today. To awaken the meaning maker within each learner and give them a sense of agency are two of the lessons I take from the first two chapters of our text.
No comments:
Post a Comment